Canada and Switzerland were more persevering: they achieved the same purposes within more than thirty five years, the first - a way some kind of competition of the "points", the second - trying to balance a supply and demand on a labour market. But the attentive analysis shows that they and did not manage to achieve that actual immigration was below "selective": they had to observe the international laws, to resolve family migration, to let in refugees, to allow to remain to time migrants and, at last, to agree that necessity for a concrete labour at concrete regions defines only very small part of migratory streams. It is paradoxical, but the fact: Switzerland and Canada receive twice more immigrants, than France. Qualitative selection of immigrants does not conduct automatically to decrease in the general migratory stream.